I Reidy I, on Sep 2 2006, 06:45 AM, said:
@ Uber: You seem to know most of the science about how the world was created (with their being "dark matter" and all), yet you still beleive "Heaven and Hell", now to me thats one of the silliest things I've ever heard. Theres no evidence of either "afterlife", but I try not to base my views on science as I like to base my views on my own experience and knowledge, rather than beleiving everything I hear because I want to justify why I am here.
Reidy, that doesn't even make sense. I believe the science, but the science has no explanation past a certain point. Naturalists want to use scientific laws to describe everything up to the point of light and dark matter but past that certain point want to break those same laws (matter can neither be created nor destroyed for example). They want us to believe that the dark matter and light just happened with no rhyme or reason. I believe that dark matter and light happened spontaneously from nothing just like they do, but the difference is I actually have a reason. God. The science makes sense after this point.
Reidy, I hope you have a better arguement than this. If you are going to gamble with your soul, I would hope you would base your choice on more than "my views on my own experience and knowledge". At least do yourself a favor and research it and get fact to back up your feelings. That way you can be confident about your choice.
When trying to decide if religion was for me, I went through a scientific/logical process. I started with the view that the bible was just a history book, not even looking at the religious teachings yet. If the bible were historically accurate, that would lend against the argument that the book is fiction. If any of you guys have read the DaVinci Code by Dan Brown, this is how they ripped that book to shreds and discredited his claim that "most" of the description and history in the book was true. If you compare the New Testament (it is easier to use this book than the Old Testament because we have better records on this time) to documented historical/archeological records, it holds up. In fact, nobody has ever been able to find a historical flaw from the Bible as a historical book. Such things as when God sent a plague of locust to destroy crops in one story of the bible. Historical records show that in this year that there was actually non-religious record of a plague that destroyed almost all of the crops in this area. Comparison after comparison, it holds up as a historical text. After you analyze all 20,000 lines of text in the New Testament, only 40 lines are in doubt. That amounts to about 400 words. Moreover, these are things such as the order of things happening or the addition or exclusion of certain things. For example, it would be equivalent to saying that Jim and his wife had a Ford Explorer that they had many problems with and finally had enough and went and bought a new Acura MDX (black in color) last week. Well the truth is that all of it is true except the color of the MDX. It is actually gold in color. Does that difference take away from the overall meaning of my story? Of course not. In the end, these 40 lines that are in doubt have no impact on the overall teachings of the book. This means that the New Testament of the Bible is about 99.5% accurate. One man couldn't make a book that was this accurate (Dan Brown). What are the chances that over 20+ authors could make a combined text with this level of accuracy. Very, very, very small. Definitely hold up as a history book. What to do now?
Well combine that with the probability that the prophecies predicted in the Old Testament hundreds of years before they actually happened is zero without some kind of divine guidance. It seems like an easy choice. I can base my rejection of God on my "feelings", or I can base my acceptance of God on fact and statistical evidence.
Gamma, to answer your question about why bad things happen in this world and we can actually say there is a God. God gave man free will (the ability to choose). That way we were not forced to love Him, but rather to follow him through our own choice, which means so much more. With the gift of free will also came the choices of man to choose between good and evil. Some choose one way, some choose the other. The choice is that of man not of God. I don't buy the whole "God has a reason for everything" bit. God created the heavens and the Earth, stepped back, and let man choose his fate. In my mind it is a totally hands off approach by God. God doesn't "let" bad things happen to some and choose to help others. That isn't how he works. Bad things happen to everyone. Some more that others. That is a shame, but it happens. Children get raped, wives get murdered, etc. but these are not choices of God. God didn't choose to let this happen to you and choose to not let it happen to another. They are done by the free will of man. Free will is a wonderful gift and a horrible curse. Kind of a paradox.
Let me make a request, please. Disprove what I have said with scientific fact or historical evidence. I can argue that a lot easier than "I feel like..." or "My aunt sally said...". If you do this, I will disprove you every time. If you have questions, that is a different story.
This post has been edited by Uberjim: 02 September 2006 - 03:52 PM