[snowy1256]

I had this idea a few weeks ago, there are quite a few games out there with horde modes. Endless waves of enemies e.g Nazi Zombies, Bulletstroms Anarchy ect.
They al require good communication and yet I have never or hardly seen leagues based on them.

So the general idea is that there are .. winners for each game and a main winner who got the most points overall
Games include:
Gears of War 2: Horde Mode
Call Of Duty Black Ops Zombies
Call Of Duty World At War Zombie
BulletStorm's Anarchy Mode
Halo Reach's FireFight
Splinter Cell Conviction

Each season wil consist of five horde modes each one will have 2 games each spanning over ten weeks.
Scoring is done by points overall. At the end of the ten weeks 5 winners for each game will be chosen and one overall winner will be chosen.

What do you think is there any interest?

[MrNinjaTree]

Having two games per "League" decreases popularity dramatically. Mixing and matching doesn't work as you're less likely to find people with both games.

I'd suggest having one game for 3 weeks, and rotating, as it keeps people involved and gives many people a chance to join in.

[snowy1256]

The idea is that each league there are five games chosen, each of the five then has two rounds/games of their horde mode played, i will of course do multiple games as their wont be enough room for more thne 4 or 5 to do a single game.

But anyway after those two rounds have been done be it back to back or staggered between others, the person who has the most points for that GAME wins and then after all the games have been played there is an overall winner

[MrNinjaTree]

And that means that those who only have one game, have no chance of winning overall.. Incentive is automatically lost

[snowy1256]

what incentive? did i say they was prizes\?
also if they got a heck load of points they would win

[MrNinjaTree]

Incentive to win, be number one. You're hindering Darwin's expectations.